{"id":321,"date":"2017-04-26T04:52:40","date_gmt":"2017-04-25T16:52:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.monsellierlaw.com\/?p=66"},"modified":"2022-03-07T13:57:21","modified_gmt":"2022-03-07T00:57:21","slug":"restraints-trade-worth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.monsellierlaw.com\/restraints-trade-worth\/","title":{"rendered":"Restraints of Trade – what are they worth?"},"content":{"rendered":"

I am often asked by employers whether they can enforce post-termination obligations against a departing employee.<\/p>\n

Understandably, many employers feel the need to safeguard the legitimate interests of their business and for that reason will insert restraint of trade provisions into their template individual employment agreement regardless.<\/p>\n

In truth, these provisions rarely are enforceable and serve little or no purpose as supported in the Authority decision of Dawson\u2019s Catering Ltd v Hawke. Here, the employer sought to obtain an urgent injunction preventing its departing employee (Hawke) from going to work in a managerial position with one of its main competitors. The employer intended to rely on two standard restraint of trade provisions commonly set out in an employment agreement \u2013 a) confidential information and b) non-compete for twelve months\u2019 post-termination. The Authority was asked to decide whether those two provisions were “valid, reasonable and enforceable” against Hawke which, if so, would prevent him from working for the competitor until July 2017.<\/p>\n

Hawke argued that the provisions were anti-competitive and, if enforceable, would prevent him from earning a living for the next year in his chosen field within all of Auckland (where he lived with his family). The Authority agreed.<\/p>\n

In contemplating its decision, the Authority considered key factors such as:<\/p>\n