April 2017

Interim ‘restraint of trade’ injunctions – are they worth it?

I am commonly asked whether restraint of trade provisions which seek to govern an employee’s conduct post-termination, are valid and enforceable. My answer is always the same – such provisions are void…. “unless they are proved to be reasonably necessary to protect a proprietary interest of the former employer”. However, some of you also wonder […]

Interim ‘restraint of trade’ injunctions – are they worth it? Read More »

Restraints of Trade – what are they worth?

I am often asked by employers whether they can enforce post-termination obligations against a departing employee. Understandably, many employers feel the need to safeguard the legitimate interests of their business and for that reason will insert restraint of trade provisions into their template individual employment agreement regardless. In truth, these provisions rarely are enforceable and

Restraints of Trade – what are they worth? Read More »

Disadvantage Grievance – what is this, and should you be worried?

Many employers are probably unaware that the laws of New Zealand permit the Employment Court to consider an alternative type of claim – commonly the “disadvantage grievance” (more formally known as a “Section 122”), even if this type of claim has not been raised by the applicant. In fact, many applicants are probably not even

Disadvantage Grievance – what is this, and should you be worried? Read More »

Redundancy – are you following the 6 x golden-rules?

Finally, the Employment Relations Authority provides some well-needed clarity on what it believes constitutes a “fair and reasonable” redundancy process. In Jarrett v Bio-Cell (NZ) Limited, the Authority sets out strict legal principles to be adopted by employer’s when embarking on a redundancy process. So, for those of you looking to reduce overheads, please read

Redundancy – are you following the 6 x golden-rules? Read More »